Fact Sheet: Joint Tenants vs Tenants in Common

Fact Sheet: Joint Tenants vs Tenants in Common

Home » Conveyancing

Joint Tenants vs Tenants in Common

Author: Bec Bradfield

}

3 min read

6 May 2026

Share:

  • r
    Key Takeaways
  • Choosing between joint tenants and tenants in common determines how control, inheritance, and financial risk are shared, making it a critical decision that should align with your relationship, goals, and estate planning strategy.
  • Ownership structures can be changed later, but doing so typically involves legal processes, costs, and agreement between owners, so it’s best to get it right from the start with professional advice.
  • The choice between joint tenants and tenants in common affects survivorship rights, estate planning, and how ownership reflects financial contributions, so it must align with your personal and financial intentions.
  • Ownership structure alone may not capture the full financial arrangement and can carry tax implications, so proper documentation and professional legal and financial advice are essential.

Stay Up-To-Date

Subscribe to receive updates specific to your preferences

When purchasing a property with another person, one of the most important decisions you will make is how you own the property. Understanding how property ownership impacts control, succession and risk is critical.

The two most common ownership structures are Joint Tenants and Tenants in Common. While both give each owner legal rights to the property, they operate very differently, particularly when it comes to estate planning, asset protection and what happens if one owner passes away.

Choosing the right structure depends on your personal circumstances, including your relationship with the co-owner, financial contributions, and long-term intentions for the property.

Why Does Your Ownership Structure Matter?

Your choice of ownership will impact:

  • Who controls the property during your lifetime
  • What happens to your share if you pass away
  • How your estate plan operates
  • Asset protection and risk exposure
  • Potential tax outcomes, including Capital Gains Tax (CGT) implications

Whether you choose to hold a property as joint tenants or tenants in common depends on your intentions, such as who you intend to inherit your share if you pass away and whether the property will be your home or an investment. Addressing these considerations helps ensure your ownership structure aligns with your broader strategy. We recommend seeking legal and financial advice to ensure it meets your intentions prior to signing a contract.

Changing Your Ownership Structure

Property ownership isn’t fixed. Owners can change from joint tenancy to tenancy in common or vice versa.

Making this change often requires:

  • Formal legal documentation
  • Agreement from all co-owners (depending on the scenario)
  • Payment of the applicable registration fees and stamp duty (depending on the scenario)
  • Lodging the updated ownership with the relevant land titles registry These changes are often prompted by events such as marriage, separation, financial planning, or other changes in personal circumstances.
Joint Tenants vs Tenants in Common Diagram
Joint Tenants vs Tenants in Common Table

Important Considerations

  • Right of Survivorship (Joint Tenants) - If one owner passes away, their interest automatically transfers to the surviving owner(s), following notification to the relevant land titles registry, regardless of any Will.
  • Estate Planning (if Tenants in Common) - Your share can be distributed according to your estate plan, making this structure more suitable where succession planning is important.
  • Unequal Contributions - Where parties contribute different amounts, a tenants in common structure may better reflect financial reality.
  • Asset Protection and Documentation - Ownership on title may not reflect actual financial contributions. In some cases, additional agreements (such as loan arrangements) may be required to properly document intentions.
  • Tax Implications - There may be CGT implications depending on the ownership structure. You should seek accounting or financial advice. Contact our Property team to ensure your ownership structure is simply strategic and fit for purpose.

How Hillhouse Legal Partners Can Help

At Hillhouse Legal Partners, we provide clear, practical legal advice to ensure your property ownership structure aligns with your legal, financial and personal objectives.

We regularly assist clients with:

  • Structuring property ownership arrangements
  • Reviewing and advising on co-ownership risks
  • Aligning ownership with estate planning strategies
  • Preparing supporting legal agreements where required

Need Advice Before You Purchase?

Before deciding on an ownership structure, it’s important to seek guidance from a legal professional who can assess your individual situation and draft the necessary documents to ensure the co-ownership agreement is clear, comprehensive, and legally binding. Choosing the right structure from the outset is critical, as selecting the wrong ownership arrangement can have long-term consequences.

The information on this fact sheet is general guidance only and is not legal advice. You should seek professional advice tailored to your circumstances.

Related Posts:
New Seller Disclosure Obligations Commence 1 August 2025 – What You Need to Know

New Seller Disclosure Obligations Commence 1 August 2025 – What You Need to Know

Home » Conveyancing

New Seller Disclosure Obligations Commence 1 August 2025 – What You Need to Know

}

3 min read

29 May 2025

Share:

  • r
    Key Takeaways
  • New laws from 1 August 2025 require Queensland residential property sellers to provide a signed Seller’s Disclosure Statement before contract signing.
  • Failure to comply can result in contract termination, full refund to the buyer, and potential legal claims.
  • Agents can assist, but accuracy, timing, and completeness are critical to ensure a valid contract.
  • Early legal advice is essential to prepare a compliant Disclosure Statement and protect your transaction.

Stay Up-To-Date

Subscribe to receive updates specific to your preferences

From 1 August 2025, Queensland will introduce a new statutory seller disclosure regime that significantly reshapes the landscape for residential property sales across the state. Under the new laws, sellers will be required to provide prospective buyers with a Seller’s Disclosure Statement before the buyer signs the contract of sale.

What is the Seller’s Disclosure Statement?

The Seller’s Disclosure Statement is a formal, legally mandated document that outlines key information about the property being sold. It is designed to provide buyers with a clear and accurate picture of the property prior to entering a contract —reducing the risk of hidden issues and shifting the burden away from the buyer to conduct extensive investigations.

The Statement must be signed by the buyer before they sign the contract and must be accompanied by a prescribed list of certificates and searches. These include (but are not limited to):

  • Current title search
  • Registered plan
  • Details of registered and unregistered encumbrances
  • Details of unregistered leases or private agreements (written or verbal)
  • Contaminated land search (where applicable)
  • Pool safety certificate (if relevant)
  • Local authority road searches
  • QCAT proceedings search
  • Heritage listing information
  • Tenancy agreements
  • Current rates and water notice amounts
  • Body corporate information, including Community Management Statement (CMS), if applicable

Put simply, the Seller’s Disclosure Statement must be comprehensive, accurate, up-to-date, and complete.

Why Is This Change Being Introduced?

Historically, Queensland has followed a ’buyer beware’ approach—placing the onus on the buyer to uncover issues by conducting searches before or after signing the contract. That approact will no longer suffice under the new laws.

The new disclosure regime reverses this position, placing a statutory obligation on sellers to proactively disclose relevant information. Failure to comply carries serious consequences.

What Happens If Sellers Get It Wrong?

If a seller fails to provide a valid and complete Seller’s Disclosure Statement before the contract is signed, the buyer has the right to:

  • Terminate the contract at any time before settlement
  • Receive a full refund of the deposit and other monies paid
  • Potentially claim compensation for losses caused by the non-disclosure

Importantly, there is no ability to contract out of the requirement. Even if a buyer agrees to waive their right to receive the Statement, such provisions are void and unenforceable.

While limited exemptions apply (such as transfers between related parties), most residential property transactions will be subject to the new regime and must comply.

What Does This Mean for Agents?

Agents play a pivotal role under the new regime. A seller may authorise their agent to prepare and provide the Disclosure Statement on their behalf—but timing, accuracy, and completeness are critical.

  • No Disclosure Statement = No valid contract
  • Incorrect Statement = Risk of termination and legal consequences
  • Outdated Statement = Delays, disputes, or grounds for termination

This change highlights the importance of early preparation and collaboration between sellers, agents, and legal representatives.

How Can We Help?

We understand that the new disclosure regime is extensive and introduces increased responsibilities for both sellers and agents. Our experienced property law team is here to help you navigate the process—from preparing compliant Seller’s Disclosure Statements to ensuring all necessary certificates and searches are in order from the outset.

Avoid unnecessary risk and delays—Let us help safeguard your property transaction.

If you need further information or support preparing a compliant Disclosure Statement, reach out to our experienced property legal team today.  We’re here to guide you through the changes with confidence.

Conveyancing update: upcoming mandate for e-conveyancing in Queensland

Conveyancing update: upcoming mandate for e-conveyancing in Queensland

Home » Conveyancing

Conveyancing update: upcoming mandate for e-conveyancing in Queensland

}

2 min read

28 Nov 2022

Share:

  • r
    Key Takeaways
  • The mandate will apply to all eligible electronic conveyancing subscribers.
  • An individual who is not a subscriber and is not represented by either an Australian legal practitioner or incorporated legal practice for the purpose of completing a transaction to which the instrument relates is not required to comply with the mandate.
  • Various circumstances are prescribed where an instrument (document) is exempt from being lodged or deposited via an electronic lodgment network (ELN).

Stay Up-To-Date

Subscribe to receive updates specific to your preferences

The Land Title Regulation 2022 (Qld) will commence on 20 February 2023. The regulation provides that in Queensland, the following instruments (documents) must be lodged via an Electronic Lodgment Network (ELN):

  • A transfer – being the Form 1 (Transfer) and Form 24 (Property Information – Transfer) required by Titles Queensland to effect the transfer of property from one party to another;
  • A mortgage or release of mortgage;
  • A caveat or request to withdraw a caveat – a caveat partially “freezes” the title to a property by preventing the registration of certain dealings over the property;
  • A priority notice, a request to extend a priority notice, a request to withdraw a priority notice – a priority notice puts third parties on notice that the priority notice holder intends to lodge a dealing on the title at a later time, and also acts to partially “freeze” the title to the property; and
  • An application to be registered as a personal representative for a registered owner of a lot who has died. 

The mandate applies to everyone except those who are not subscribers to an ELN and do not have a solicitor or law firm acting for them. 

Various circumstances are prescribed where an instrument is exempt from being lodged or deposited via the ELN. These include:

  • Where the ELN does not have the functionality to facilitate the lodgment or if technical difficulties prevent the instrument from being lodged or deposited;
  • Where the instrument gives effect to a transaction that is not an ELN lodgement or ELN transfer as defined under section 156D of the Duties Act 2001 (Qld). For example, transfers of land that are exempt from duty due to an earlier agreement for the transfer do not satisfy the definition of a ELN lodgement or ELN transfer and are therefore exempt; and
  • As a transitional provision, a required instrument that was executed in hard copy before 20 February 2023 cannot be lodged or deposited with an ELN. 

Our firm are current longstanding subscribers to PEXA and have settled many properties using the platform. We will be welcoming the mandate coming into effect in February 2023.

If you require any assistance with a conveyancing matter, please contact us by email or phone 07 3220 1144. We are here to help.

Areas of Expertise

Residential Tenancy Law Reform in Queensland – what landlords and tenants need to know

Residential Tenancy Law Reform in Queensland – what landlords and tenants need to know

Home » Conveyancing

Residential Tenancy Law Reform in Queensland – what landlords and tenants need to know

}

4 min read

9 Nov 2022

Share:

  • r
    Key Takeaways
  • On 1 October 2022, numerous changes to Queensland residential tenancy laws commenced under the Housing Legislation Amendment Act 2021.
  • The changes were introduced to better regulate leased properties across the State and increase obligations of landlords in certain respects.
  • If you own a residential investment property that is tenanted, it is important you are aware of these changes and the further changes coming into effect next year.

Stay Up-To-Date

Subscribe to receive updates specific to your preferences

On 1 October 2022, numerous changes to Queensland residential tenancy laws commenced under the Housing Legislation Amendment Act 2021 (amending the law under the Residential Tenancies and Rooming Accommodation Act 2008). These changes were introduced to better regulate leased residential properties across the State and increase obligations of landlords in certain respects. They have been described by Minister for Communities and Housing as “the final step that enlivens to the important Stage 1 Rental Law Reforms passed by the Parliament in 2021”.[1] 

For tenants, the changes mean increased protections in ending tenancies, and it is now easier for tenants to keep pets. For landlords, increased repair and maintenance obligations have been introduced which align with the staggered introduction of Minimum Housing Standards from 1 September 2023 discussed further below. 

Minimum Housing Standards 

The Minimum Housing Standards (‘Standards’) will apply to new leases entered into from 1 September 2023 and all tenancies from 1 September 2024. According to Minister Enoch, the Standards will “help to ensure all Queensland rental properties meet basic safety, security, and functionality standards”[2]. The Standards will require tenanted premises to be, amongst other things: 

  • weatherproof and structurally sound; and
  • free from pests, damp and mould. 

Fixtures and fittings of the premises must also be in good repair. 

Under the commenced changes, tenants must return the entry condition report for the premises within 7 days of occupying the premises, and can authorise emergency repairs up to the equivalent of four weeks’ rent. 

If you own a residential investment property that is tenanted, it is important you are aware of these changes and those associated with the upcoming implementation next year. Now is the time to plan ahead for any work that may be needed to comply with the Standards and the legislation by 1 September 2023. 

If you own a property in a community titles scheme, you should aim to clarify your personal obligations as owner with the body corporate prior to the Standards being enforced in September 2023. The new regulations may cultivate disputes in body corporate schemes as to who is responsible for what – the owner or the body corporate, and therefore it is important owners think ahead.

Ending tenancies

From 1 October 2022, landlords are no longer able to end tenancies ‘without grounds’. However, tenants are able to end tenancies in this manner. Tenants can also end tenancies in situations where the property is not in good repair or fails to meet the Standards. 

There will be new grounds for property owners to end tenancies, including ending a fixed term agreement: 

  • for undertaking significant repair or renovation;
  • for change of use; or
  • in preparation for sale of the property. 

However, where there has been a serious breach of a lease by a tenant, landlords will have to seek an order from QCAT to terminate the tenancy. 

Pets 

The changes will make it easier for tenants to keep pets. The tenant can seek the owner’s consent, and owners can only refuse a request to keep a pet on identified reasonable grounds. For example, if keeping the pet would be in breach of the law or applicable by-laws. Consent may be subject to conditions such as only keeping the pet outside. If property owners do not respond to requests within 14 days, consent will be implied. 

If you would like further guidance around the reforms and their effect on your personal circumstances, please contact us by email or phone 07 3220 1144. Likewise, if you require assistance with another property-related matter, we can certainly assist.

[1] https://statements.qld.gov.au/statements/94557.

[2] https://statements.qld.gov.au/statements/94557.

Sunset clauses and early release of deposits

Sunset clauses and early release of deposits

Home » Conveyancing

Sunset clauses and early release of deposits

}

3 min read

25 Oct 2022

Share:

  • r
    Key Takeaways
  • An “off the plan” contract is a sale contract for a lot that does not yet exist - usually a vacant block of land in a housing estate that is yet to be subdivided, or a proposed lot under construction in a community titles scheme.
  • Public feedback pertaining to “off the plan” contracts is currently under review by the Queensland Government.
  • Once the feedback is assessed, potential change to the use of sunset clauses by developers (in their capacity as seller) to terminate the contract and the early release of deposits prior to settlement may be implemented.

Stay Up-To-Date

Subscribe to receive updates specific to your preferences

As part of the Queensland Government’s Property Law Review currently underway, two online surveys were released (one for consumers and one for developers) regarding issues around residential off-the-plan contracts. Feedback received from those surveyed will be reviewed and assessed over the coming months.

In an effort to respond to concerns of buyers of “off the plan” properties, particularly given the rapid rate of migration of interstate residents to Queensland during the peak of Covid-19, the Government identified two key issues for public feedback: 

  1. The use of sunset clauses by developers (in their capacity as seller) to terminate the contract; and
  2. Early release of deposits from a trust account to developers (sellers) prior to settlement, termination or finalisation of the contract. 

To provide context, an ‘off the plan’ residential property sales contract typically refers to a contract for a proposed lot, such as: 

  1. a vacant block of land in a new housing estate; or
  2. a proposed lot to be included in a community titles scheme, such as an ‘under construction’ apartment in a multi-storey building. 

An ‘off the plan’ contract should contain a ‘sunset clause’ which is a term in the contract allowing a buyer and/or seller to terminate the contract if the contract does not settle by a specified date. 

For a vacant block of land, section 14(1) of the Land Sales Act 1984 (Qld) states that the seller of a proposed lot must settle the contract for the sale of the lot not later than 18 months after the buyer enters into the contract for the sale of the lot. 

For a proposed lot in a community titles scheme, the Body Corporate and Community Management Act 1997 (Qld) allows for settlement to occur up to 5.5 years from the date of the contract.

Whilst those dates are the maximum, they can be reduced under the terms of a particular contract if the buyer and seller agree to do so. 

In ‘off the plan’ contracts, settlement can only occur once the proposed lot is registered. Typically, settlement will occur 14 or 21 days from registration of the plan. 

Given the technical considerations and complex requirements in property law, the Government is consulting with community and industry stakeholders to ensure solutions developed as part of the Property Law Review address relevant issues at hand, without producing unintended consequences. 

If you are considering purchasing ‘off the plan’, require a contract review or would like to know more about purchasing registered or unregistered property, please do not hesitate to contact us at email or call 07 3220 1144.

UPDATED – Changes To Land Tax Assessment

UPDATED – Changes To Land Tax Assessment

Home » Conveyancing

UPDATED – Changes To Land Tax Assessment

}

3 min read

6 Oct 2022

Share:

  • r
    Key Takeaways
  • From the 1st of July 2023, the method of calculating land tax in Queensland will change.
  • State-based land tax is currently assessed on Queensland-owned freehold land, excluding the family home, in excess of $600,000 for individuals and $350,000 for companies and trusts.
  • The new legislation, as outlined on the Queensland Government website, states that the ownership of interstate land will affect the calculation of Queensland land tax.

Stay Up-To-Date

Subscribe to receive updates specific to your preferences

Since publication of this article, the Queensland Government has announced it is shelving plans to amend the rules around land tax liability. The effect of the proposed changes involved calculating the value of an owner’s interstate property portfolio to determine what rates they should pay for any land they owned in Queensland.

Following announcement of the reforms, public statements were made by the Tasmanian, New South Wales and Northern Territory premiers confirming they would not provide landholding records to confirm interstate holdings of investors. In light of the pushback, the Queensland Government has determined it would have great difficulty enforcing the changes.

The shelving of the reforms is good news for landowners and occupants of investment properties in that it provides greater certainty around future estimates of land tax liability for proprietors, and amounts payable by tenants presuming they would bear the cost of the increased liability by way of higher rent or collection of outgoings.

While the reforms have been shelved, it should be noted there is a possibility they could be reinstated in the future (although this is unlikely). 

The way land tax is being calculated in Queensland is changing. Land tax is a state-based tax and is assessed on freehold land beyond a certain value currently owned in excess of a value of around $600,000 for individuals and $350,000 for companies and trusts. 

It is a value tax and the taxable rate is between 1% – 2.25% for individuals and 1.5% – 2.75% for companies and trusts.

The family home is usually exempt. 

Until recently the land assessed to calculate the tax was only on land owned in Queensland. No other land outside that state was taken into consideration when calculating that state’s land tax. [1] 

As of 1 July 2023, all relevant land owned in Australia will be used to ascertain:

  • whether the Queensland land tax-free threshold has been exceeded; and
  • the rate of Queensland land tax that will be applied to the Queensland proportion of the value of your landholdings.

So the interstate land is not technically taxed but ownership of interstate land will affect how much Queensland land tax you will pay. The rate of land tax effectively goes up in those circumstances. 

The example on the Queensland government website shows that a Queensland taxpayer that owns Queensland taxable land valued at $745,000 and Victorian land valued at $1,565,000 would have to pay an extra $6,472.37 every year in land tax. [2] A NSW landowner states that his Queensland land tax liability will increase by about $27,000 a year. [3]

There will also be increased reporting obligations. 

The Queensland government is defending the new law as a way to prevent interstate land investors from taking advantage of multiple tax-free and progressive rate thresholds. [4]  

Commentators are questioning the constitutionality and efficacy of the new law. [5]  It is reported that the NSW government is even seeking advice as to the constitutionality of the Queensland law. [6] 

The REIQ is critical of the proposed law and feels that the proposed increase in land tax will “hurt Queensland landholders, renters, companies, and small businesses in one fell swoop”[7]. Indeed the REIQ is calling for this land tax regime to be repealed. [8]

If you require any assistance regarding your land tax liability or you wish to discuss the issue further. Please do not hesitate to send us an email or call 07 3220 1144. We are here to help.

[1] https://www.reiq.com/articles/reiq-calls-for-repeal-of-illogical-land-tax-regime/ 

[2] https://www.qld.gov.au/environment/land/tax/interstate 

[3] https://www.afr.com/property/residential/new-queensland-land-tax-will-drive-away-investors-20220905-p5bfgi

[4] https://documents.parliament.qld.gov.au/tp/2022/5722T897-861E.pdf 

[5] https://www.afr.com/property/residential/new-queensland-land-tax-will-drive-away-investors-20220905-p5bfgi 

[6] https://au.sports.yahoo.com/qld-property-sector-seeks-land-021603456.html 

[7] https://www.reiq.com/articles/reiq-calls-for-repeal-of-illogical-land-tax-regime/ 

[8] https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ZovtWKS4LvE